Economic Indicators

This section contains several articles:

1. Economic Outlook, 2001
Dr. Rupinder Singh, Senior Economist, The Economist Intelligence Unit and former advisor to the Azerbaijan government


2. Economic Indicators and Reform Challenges, 2001
Mark Dutz, Office of the Chief Economist, EBRD


3. Fiscal Policy, 2001
The Honorable Avaz Alakbarov, Minister of Finance


4. A Glimpse at U.S. Exports and Imports in 2000
Derek Nowek and Kelly Raftery, BISNIS, U.S. Department of Commerce


To obtain the following articles, please contact USACC
E-mail: chamber@usacc.org


Economic Indicators, 2000
Stephanie Inman, Director, Ernst & Young (CIS)

Economic Performance and Prospects, 2000
Veronica Kalema, Ph.D., Analyst, Transition Economies
The Economist Intelligence Unit

Economic Performance and Prospects,1999, John MacLeod



Economic Outlook
Dr. Rupinder Singh
Senior Economist, The Economist Intelligence Unit and former advisor to the Azerbaijan government

MEDIUM-TERM HORIZON TO 2005

Executive Summary

Real GDP grew by 11.1% in 2000, largely as a result of high oil prices and the recovery of regional demand. Real GDP growth will moderate to an annual average growth rate of about 8% in 2001-05. The energy sector will continue to be the chief engine of growth, with foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows peaking in 2003. ? The government will take advantage of high oil export revenue to ease monetary policy and embark on limited expansionist programmes such as strategic infrastructure projects. Growth in the non-oil sector will continue to lag behind that in the oil-based sector, and uneven supply-side and banking reforms will lead to at best moderate gains in the business environment. ?

Annual average inflation will rise to an annual average 3.5% in 2002-05, with continuing fiscal prudence and slight monetary easing to 2002. Real exchange-rate stability is expected to continue until 2005, when the volume of oil exports and related revenue proceeds surge, causing real appreciation. ?

The fiscal deficit narrowed in 2000, as a result of strong economic growth and high oil prices. Balanced budgets are not expected until after 2005, when oil exports and related fiscal receipts will increase substantially. The current account is estimated to have posted a small deficit in 2000, but is forecast to record higher deficits from 2001, as oil prices ease and FDI increases.

Key indicators 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Real GDP growth (%) 11.1 8.1 8.7 8.0 7.4 7.5
Consumer price inflation (av; %) 1.8 1.7 2.4 2.8 3.3 3.5
General government balance (% of GDP) Ð1.8 Ð1.9 Ð2.3 Ð2.4 Ð2.3 Ð2.1
Current-account balance (% of GDP) Ð0.2 Ð1.3 Ð4.3 Ð5.7 Ð7.0 Ð6.7
Exchange rate Manat:US$ (av) 4,474.2 4,688.9 4,888.1 5,059.9 5,166.4 5,313.1

 

Points to watch

Although our baseline assumes limited reform zeal, the combination of recent institutional changes coupled with the IMF agreement concluded in early July could catalyse faster structural reform, particularly in banking and agriculture, which would raise our assessment for medium-term sustainable growth. The risk of a hard landing in the US has given way to one of assessing how hard it will be and how long it will last. A protracted US slowdown and global deceleration in demand could, in an environment of excess global oil supply, lead to a rapid fall in world oil prices, thereby affecting both the inflows on the current account and fiscal receipts.

Business environment rankings
Value of index (out of 10)
Global rank (out of 60 countries)
Regional rank (out of 10 countries)*
1996-2000
2001-05
1996-2000
2001-05
1996-2000
2001-05
4.35
5.28
50
52
5
8
* Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia and Ukraine.

 

Azerbaijan's regional ranking in the EIU Business enviornment ranking worsens from 5th for the historical period to 8th for the forecast period, and its global ranking falls by 2 places to 52nd out of 60 countries. Despite a continuing reform drive in Azerbaijan, other transition economies are making faster progress. The macroeconomic environment will remain stable, but the unresolved Nagorno-Karabakh dispute, concerns about political stability, overreliance on the oil sector and lagging structural reforms will maintain the country’s relatively high risk business environment profile.

SHORT TERM OUTLOOK TO 2002

Economic policy outlook

Policy trends

With macroeconomic stabilization secured in recent years, structural and institutional reform will continue, albeit at a moderate pace. The approval in July of a three-year, US$100m loan from the IMF is conditioned on deeper fiscal reforms, including greater governance in handling public funds, the creation of an oil fund and further liberalisation of the trade regime. Monetary policy will ease and the nominal exchange rate will depreciate at a faster pace than previously expected, as the authorities attempt to reverse the real appreciation against the Turkish lira recorded in the first half of 2001. Fiscal policy will remain broadly sound, although more transparent accounting of formerly off-budget “quasi-fiscal” activity through state-owned enterprises will moderate recorded fiscal surpluses. Privatisation of remaining state assets will remain sluggish and non-transparent.

Fiscal policy

Fiscal policy will further improve as the government continues to widen the tax base and maintain better control over expenditure. Following the deficit in 2000 of Manat239.2bn (US$53.5m; 1.8% of GDP), we expect the 2001 consolidated general government deficit to be 1.9% of GDP, slightly below the government’s target of 2%. As part of the IMF agreement, the government will set up an oil fund, which will assist in reducing the implied volatility of budgetary revenue streams resulting from changes in oil prices. It will also improve the planning and execution of multi-year fiscal accounts. Planned reforms to the Customs Committee and improved internal auditing will further assist fiscal management, although we expect little headway in aggressively reducing quasi-fiscal implicit subsidies. The 2001 budget is broadly realistic in assuming an average oil export price of US$21/barrel (lower than our forecast for Dated Brent crude in 2001, which we have revised upwards to an average US$27/b), although the average exchange rate assumed in the budget of Manat4,600:US$1 will be exceeded. The 2001 budget should benefit from rising value-added tax (VAT) collection, and, once initial problems of implementation have been overcome, a new and more effective tax code. The state budget was in surplus in the first four months of 2001 by Manat25.1bn (US$12.7m), equivalent to 0.3% of GDP.

Economic forecast

International assumptions

On balance, we expect external conditions for Azerbaijan to remain relatively favourable in 2001-02, with a limited risk of external shocks. Despite the sharp global slowdown in 2001 on the back of a slowing US economy, both US and global growth are forecast to pick up in 2002. However, there is a risk that a protracted US downturn would compress oil prices below the average of US$26-27/b that we expect for 2001-02. Cotton prices are expected to be firmer in 2002, despite recent one-year lows in May 2001. We expect Turkish real GDP to decline by 5% in 2001, before rebounding in 2002, which together with the large devaluation in February of the Turkish lira will reduce demand for Azerbaijani tradables in 2001. However, continuing growth in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), and in particular Russian markets, will have a positive impact on Azerbaijan's exports. Azerbaijani policymakers will continue to monitor foreign-exchange developments, particularly of the Russian rouble and Turkish lira, both of which will depreciate in nominal terms against the US dollar in 2001-02, putting pressure on Azerbaijan to sanction competitive devaluation to assist the non-oil tradable sector.

Economic growth

We expect real GDP growth in Azerbaijan to moderate from 11.1% in 2000 to over 8% per year in 2001-02. Rising volumes of oil exports will partly offset the expected decline in oil prices, although we expect oil export volumes to be below 2m barrels/year, compared with the government’s recent projections of 2.5m b/y. The spill over from the oil boom into construction will continue, while growth in agriculture will remain restrained, owing to poor financing and lagging supply-side reforms. We expect foreign direct investment (FDI) to continue to flow into the energy and construction sectors at a rate of over US$1bn per year, contributing to growth in gross fixed investment. Although oil-based revenue and fees will allow the government to increase welfare payments, economic growth will remain narrowly based.

Revised estimates for 2000 show an increase in Azerbaijan's nominal GDP from Manat21.9trn to Manat23.6trn, although real GDP growth has been adjusted downwards by 0.3 percentage points, to 11.1%, as a result of a higher valuation for the GDP deflator. Nominal GDP in the first five months of 2001 was Manat8.3trn, up by 8.3% year on year in real terms, with both industrial production and agricultural production posting rises of 5.5%. Oil production is expected to increase in 2001, as is investment, both of which posted only modest rises in 2000. The Azerbaijan International Operating Company (AIOC, the main foreign oil consortium in the country) plans to raise oil output in 2001 by around 5%, and will increase investment substantially.

Inflation

Average inflation was 1.8% in 2000, a substantial acceleration from the 8.6% deflation in 1999. Annual inflation was 1.3% in May 2001, compared with a rate of 2% in May 2000, with average monthly inflation at 0.8% in the first five months of 2001. We expect annual average inflation in 2001 to moderate to 1.7% on the back of a strong exchange rate that will reduce imported inflation and excess supply on the domestic market. We expect a slight acceleration in inflation in 2002 to an annual average of 2.4% in response to monetary loosening. The balance of inflationary risks in 2002 is on the downside. Poor financial intermediation and inadequate creditor rights will prevent the threat of credit-based inflation. However, higher than expected currency inflows will, without a compensating rise in US dollar money demand on the interbank market, lead to higher manat monetization, which will have inflationary consequences.

Exchange rates

The medium-term objective of the Azerbaijan National Bank (ANB, the central bank) remains to retain real exchange-rate parity against the US dollar, which it has successfully retained since late 1997. The manat stabilized in the second quarter of 2001, following the contagious impact of the Turkish financial crisis and devaluation of the Turkish lira in the first quarter of the year. The ANB inter-vened heavily—equivalent to 4.5% of total currency turnover at the inter-bank market over the quarter—to prevent the manat from depreciating by too much from the ANB’s perceived equilibrium rate. With confidence in the manat re-established and the contagious impact of the Turkish crisis on payment and settlement systems controlled, the ANB is expected to countenance some devaluation against the Turkish lira to recoup the real loss of the first quarter. We expect year-end nominal exchange rates of Manat4,788:US$1 in 2001 and Manat5,000:US$1 in 2002, implying devaluation of 4.4% per year in 2001-02, and slightly above the 4.1% nominal devaluation in 2000.

Currency turnover rose in June on the interbank market, with the ANB buying US dollars to maintain the stability of the currency. The higher demand for manat was attributable to the push by the State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR) to settle tax arrears by converting a large volume of hard currency. Although this one-off transaction does not augur a reversion to a trend of nominal exchange-rate appreciation, we have moderated our earlier forecasts of the extent of likely manat nominal depreciation in 2001-02.

External sector

The current-account balance is expected to return to the trend of deficits as a share of GDP, following the temporary respite in 2000 caused by buoyant oil prices. Lower oil prices in 2001-02 will lead to relatively weak growth in export revenue, despite a slight increase in oil export volumes. On the import side, costs will rise substantially. In 2001 and 2002 high investment into the AIOC phase one expansion project will lead to a rise in imports of capital goods. Services debits related to development of the oil sector will also increase. The development of the Shah Deniz gas field is expected to start in the second half of 2001, following the recent signing of a 15-year gas sales contract with Turkey. This will require investment of US$2.6bn, according to BP, as well as a further US$700m investment in a pipeline between Baku and Erzurum in Turkey, which will also contribute to import expenditure. The current account is therefore expected to be in deficit in 2001-02, although at US$253m (4.3% of GDP) the deficit in 2002 will be modest compared with those in the recent past. The current-account deficit will remain sustainable, owing to compensating oil- and gas-related inflows of FDI on the capital account. Azerbaijan recorded a trade surplus in January-May 2001 of US$440m, with exports of US$811m and imports of US$371m. Oil-based exports accounted for 90% of export receipts in this period.

Economic Indicators and Reform Challenges
Mark Dutz
Office of the Chief Economist, EBRD

RECENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS

Real GDP Growth (1989 = 100)

Continued strong growth fuelled by investment in oil and gas sectors. High oil prices and stronger demand from Russia contributed to 11.1 percent GDP growth in 2000, accelerating from 7.4% in 1999. Although growth has been more broad-based than in previous years, with strong increases in metallurgy, chemical and petrochemical production, and agriculture, oil continues to be the leading sector, accounting for roughly 85% of exports. In March, Azerbaijan and Turkey signed key 15-year gas purchase agreements that created the commercial and legal framework for developing the Shah Deniz gas field and proposed Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum gas export pipeline. Together with continued investor interest in the Sponsor Group for the proposed Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline (with the basic engineering study completed in May and the detailed engineering launched in June) and further development of the Azeri-Chirag-Guneshli oil fields, expected investments in oil and gas should stimulate further growth forecasted at 8.5% for 2001.

Current Account Balance and Real Exchange Rates

Inflation and exchange rates remain stable, underpinned by sound fiscal and monetary policies. Annual average inflation for 2000 rose to 1.8%, from -8.5% in 1999, in response to a slightly loose monetary policy aimed to make credit more easily available to the non-oil sectors. It is estimated at 1.3% for 2001. A mild, steady depreciation of the nominal USD exchange rate in 2000 appears to have prevented an appreciation of the real effective exchange rate. The 2000 consolidated government fiscal balance (including the Oil Fund) moved into surplus in 2000 to 0.4% of GDP, compared with a deficit of 4.8 percent in 1999. This was driven by the sharp increase in oil prices raising nominal GDP, combined with no changes in tax or expenditure policies, leading to an almost doubling in oil-related revenues and a reduction in expenditures as a share of GDP. A consolidated fiscal deficit of 0.5 percent is planned for 2001.

 
Nominal Exchange Rates




Inflation and Interst Rates


The external balance is improved, with future FDI inflows covering current account deficits. The current account deficit in 2000 fell to -2.7% of GDP (from -13.2% in 1999), with a positive trade balance driven by significantly higher export revenues. Oil exports more than doubled in dollar terms, while non-oil exports, in particular cotton, also increased significantly. Oil sector imports declined due to a temporary slowdown in foreign investment activity. With expected increases in capital goods and service imports associated with the major oil and gas projects, the current account deficit is expected to widen again to –6% in 2001. However, high FDI inflows should more than cover deficits over the next years.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN STRUCTURAL REFORM

Sound guidelines for the management and investment of Oil Fund assets are established. A Presidential Decree was issued on policy guidelines to ensure that Oil Fund assets are managed prudently, that they will not be used for loans or loan guarantees, and that information about investments based on annual audits will be made public. The Fund will invest mainly in overseas assets to preserve mineral wealth for future generations, with only interest earnings being available to support government expenditures. Although the Oil Fund and state budgets are not formally integrated, the authorities have agreed that the Oil Fund and state budgets will be prepared in close coordination, and expenditures of the Oil Fund executed through the treasury. The consolidated budget execution will be published quarterly. Oil Fund-related decisions were an important element underpinning the recent approval of a new 3-year IMF program and an upgrade in Azerbaijan’s long-term foreign currency rating from B+ to BB- (Fitch IBCA).

Structural weaknesses within public finances are being addressed slowly... Revenues to GDP are low by regional standards, and there is a large quasi-fiscal deficit in the energy sector with total tax arrears excluding penalties of 14% of GDP. Tax and fiscal administration reform should help bolster public revenues through improved transparency and clarity, notwithstanding the fact that the 2001 tax code reduces the VAT rate from 20 to 18%. The distortionary provisions allowing double depreciation are expected to be revised within the 2002 budget. Expenditure management has been improved, with progress in implementing a single treasury account and the development of a new expenditure monitoring system. Regarding the treatment of tax arrears, the authorities issued a decree granting the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Taxes the authority to oversee the cash flow of the largest taxpaying state-owned enterprises. SOCAR, the state-owned oil company responsible for most of the tax arrears, will be given a tax credit for the quasi-fiscal activities undertaken for the government (including provision of oil and gas to Azerenergy and Azerigas), which will be offset against SOCAR’s pre-2001 tax arrears. From 2002, any such subsidies must be explicitly included in the state budget.

…with a commitment to strengthen the competitiveness of government debt markets. To keep oil resources for longer-term development purposes, there has been a shift in deficit financing in 2000 from reliance on oil bonuses to treasury bills and privatization receipts. In response to the high cost of t-bill issuance linked to alleged collusion, the State Committee for Securities (SCS) in agreement with the Ministry of Finance adopted revised regulations on the issue, placement and circulation of t-bills. In order to further improve operations, the authorities are committed to design a program jointly with SCS, the Azerbaijan National Bank (ANB) and the Baku Stock Exchange to enhance competition in this market.

A series of measures are being taken to improve governance, critical to help spur growth in non-oil sectors of the economy. The private sector remains very concerned about corruption, the absence of a level playing field for all enterprises and the sometimes-arbitrary implementation of tax and other regulations. The authorities have committed to develop a comprehensive anti-corruption program during 2001. As part of government efforts to enhance governance, the head of a new Chamber of Accounts has been appointed. As the government’s supreme audit institution, this body will be given the authority to audit all government bodies including all extra-budgetary funds and will be obligated to make public reports of its findings. In addition, the authorities have begun to implement reforms of the Cabinet of Ministers, including the merging of former ministries of State Property, Economy and Trade, and the Antimonopoly and Foreign Investment Regulatory Committees, into a new Ministry of Economic Development, and the establishment of new Ministries of Fuel and Energy, and Ecology and Natural Resources. As part of this reform, policy-making and regulatory functions will be removed from commercial state-owned enterprises and both initially transferred to relevant government ministries. To streamline and improve effectiveness of the government bureaucracy, a new civil service law was adopted, together with a selective hiring freeze and substantial selective wage increases for qualified high-level personnel. To help level the playing field regarding government purchasing, a revised procurement law has been submitted to parliament for approval. Medium and large-scale privatization is re-launched … While small-scale privatization is nearly complete, privatization of medium- and large-scale enterprises has lagged. Since the adoption of the second privatization program in August 2000, 39 cash and 20 voucher auctions have been held to the end of the first quarter of 2001, with 127 state enterprises being offered for sale for the first time. In addition, since case-by-case privatization began in late 1998, ten companies have been privatized through competitive tenders, including most recently poultry farming, flour milling, wine production and sporting facilities. However, in terms of privatization revenues, the progress made to the end of the first quarter 2001 has been modest: of a total of only $118 million in privatization revenues since 1996, receipts generated in 2000 and the first quarter of 2001 account for 12% of the total. More than half this amount is still generated from the outstanding small-scale privatization. Importantly, official lists of some 450 larger enterprises open for privatization to both foreign and domestic investors were published end-March 2001, including enterprises of the telecommunications, fuel and energy, mechanical engineering, chemical, and fish industries, and the state-owned airline AZAL.

...with additional preparation of major projects required to ensure success. Although tender results were announced in March 2001 for a long-term management contract for BAGES, the Baku electricity distribution network, the completion of the transaction with the tender winner appears to be plagued by the absence of an adequate regulatory framework, the poor quality of available information, as well as, vaguely formulated tender documents. On the other hand, the tender of the 25-year management contract for Azerbaijan Aluminium, awarded to the Dutch company Fondel Metal in March, has been finalised. The foreign company has committed to invest US$ 5 million over 5 years while the government has granted concessions on supplies of electricity, natural gas and on the transport of raw materials and equipment until 2005.

Reform of power and gas is urgent both to eliminate the large quasi-fiscal deficit and to enhance competitiveness of the whole economy. The quasi-fiscal deficit in the energy sector was estimated at 13% of GDP in 1999, roughly half from electricity and half from gas. The deficit originates from: (1) losses in revenues by SOCAR from below opportunity cost prices for fuel oil and gas supplied to Azerenergy and Azerigaz; (2) non-payments, with only 44% of gas and 41% of power supply billings collected and several groups of the population not billed for utilities’ services; and (3) technical losses, internal use of power supply and theft. Accumulation of this deficit has many adverse implications including foregone fiscal revenues, postponed restructuring of enterprises benefiting from implicit subsidies, excessive energy consumption from distorted tariffs, deferral of maintenance, and facilitation of corruption from non-transparent operations. The authorities are developing a program to resolve these problems. To develop a culture of payments, the budget provision for utility consumption by budgetary organisations has been sharply increased, with accountability for not exceeding budgeted levels of consumption. To foster private participation and improved metering, management contract tenders for all distribution networks are planned—though it may be more appropriate to ensure an appropriate regulatory framework, including cost-recovery tariffs, in place by then to attract serious strategic investors.

Further reforms in the banking sector are needed to enable more vigorous private sector development. The banking system has undergone some further consolidation over the past year, down from 68 to 53 banks. However, it remains “overbanked” and undercapitalized, with total manat deposits equivalent to 1.3% of GDP. The privatization of International Bank of Azerbaijan (IBA, the country’s largest bank) has been repeatedly delayed and will now most likely take place in the coming 12 months. The other three state-owned banks have been restructured by merging the viable parts into a single bank, the United Universal Bank (UUB), and by transferring non-performing assets to a collection agency. An important step in that process was the recent revocation of the license of Agroprom Bank. The completion of the successful privatization of IBA and UUB remains a major challenge, as does the consolidation of the sector and the establishment of a level playing field.

Click here to view the data summary chart

Fiscal Policy
The Honorable Avaz Alakbarov
Minister of Finance

The independent Republic of Azerbaijan has successfully completed another year of its development in all spheres of social and political life, including the economy. Macroeconomic indicators of the country and their analysis are good evidence of this success. A comprehensive approach to economic process, acting within real resources, consecutive economic development and other economic reforms have contributed to macroeconomic stability, development without inflation, increase in the production of industrial goods and foreign investment in the country, in 2000.

In 2000, increase in the gross domestic product (GDP) was 11,4%, reaching its peak during the last five years. GDP production per capita has increased 10,5% compared with 1999. Since 1999, the shares of real production in GDP have increased from 46,4% to 48,2%. Production in the leading sphere of the economy, industry, has increased 6,9% compared with 1999. Increase in the governmental sector of the industry was 3% and in the non-governmental sector, it was 12%. In 2000, growth in agriculture was 12,1%, compared with the year before. Total amount of the investment attracted for the development of the social and economic spheres grew 2,6%, since 1999. The volume of trade and cash services has grown 9,8% and 5,8%, respectively. Bank deposits of the citizens have increased 42,8%, and the rate of inflation in 2000 was 1,8%. In addition, there was no increase in prices and tariffs. The rate of monthly salary and revenue per capita has increased 15% and 10,2%, respectively.

It is particularly noteworthy that the share of the non-governmental sector in GDP has grown from 62% to 67,8%. This fact proves that the transition to a market economy in Azerbaijan is going forward. The government has had a positive role in balancing the economy and implementing the right fiscal and monetary policy. In 2000, all necessary measures were taken to identify and realize the main parameters for the fiscal policy. These measures include both tax and budget expenditures. The Tax Code that was adopted in 2000 is a positive step towards the regulation of the tax system. The new Tax Code identifies nine types of tax, which is less than the number of taxes as stipulated in the previous legislation. The Tax Code sets a maximum rate of taxes and it is stressed that lower tax rates are likely to be provided for the next year, under the Budget Law approved every year. Thereby, it makes the new tax legislation very advantageous for investors.

Maximum rates for VAT and profit taxes have been lowered from 20% to 18% and from 30% to 27% respectively. To advance foreign economic relations, expand entrepreneurship, create an advantageous environment for production of competitive products and protect the domestic market, the rate of import duties have been changed for the year 2001. In 2000, a significant amount of work was done to implement commitments as a member of international institutions, carry out economic reforms with international financial institutions and draw up and performing various cooperation programs. An external debt limit was set for the purpose of providing external debt service within the countries resources. All expenditures that are needed for the cooperation with social, political, and financial institutions were taken into consideration in the budget and services were provided at the required level.

The strategy for poverty reduction in Azerbaijan was prepared together with consultant-experts of financial institutions and agreed to by the IMF and World Bank. Azerbaijan's international economic relations have developed since the country's accession to the Council of Europe. The integration of Azerbaijan with Europe is going on rapidly. To place Azerbaijan in the world securities market, significant works have been done to identify financial agents, explore credits ratings and issue international securities. Restructuring of government banks is under way. Three banks: Azerbaijan Agriculture-Industrial Commercial Joint Bank, Industrial Investment Commercial Joint Bank, and Savings Bank, have already merged into one United Universal Bank, in which, 100% of shares belong to the Government. It is expected that this bank will be privatized in the near future.

In 2000, budget revenue forecasts and budget expenditures grew 27% and 17.2% respectively, compared with 1999. Expenditures allocated to the sciences increased by 17.7%, to education by 14%, to health by 9.9% and to social protection and social provision by 15.5%, to culture, arts, mass media and physical education by 19%. Social protection is regarded as a priority and to increase expenditures in this area is our strategy. In 2000, the share of social protection formed 64.2% of virtual expenditures. It is 12% more than it was in 1999. In accordance with the Decree of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, we managed to increase salaries in the areas of sciences, education, health and culture.

The fiscal deficit in 2000 was reduced to 1.1% of GDP and positive works of 2000 are being carried into 2001. Nearly 50 documents have been prepared to be distributed among taxpayers to educate them about the new Tax Code. Financial aids for the private sector, including implementations of poverty reduction programs for children, disabled persons, refugees, and IDPs, hold a great share in 2001 budget expenditures. A lot of works have been done to further treasury system development and to increase the role of treasury bodies in the process of state expenditure management. In order to implement an effective and successful fiscal policy in Azerbaijan the following matters should be implemented:

- to adopt a new State Budget Law in order to improve the process of state budget preparation, adoption, execution and execution monitoring, and in connection with this, to provide the preparation of state budget classification and its implementation,

- to properly control the disbursement of budget funds, to take effective measures in order to decrease the debts between debtors and creditors, and in general to provide financial discipline throughout the country,

- to prepare the country's poverty reduction program in order to tackle this problem in the country,

- to strengthen the activity and cooperation with external credit beneficiaries in order to enable them to provide timely payments in respect of guaranteed credits,

- to improve the structure of government and administration systems,

- to accomplish the task of agriculture sector development and preparation of a special financing program in this sphere,

- to prepare the action program in order to continue non-oil sector development, with the encouragement of small- and medium-scale entrepreneurship,structural reforms and transition to a market economy to solve existing unemployment and poverty reduction problems. Azerbaijan is a country with rich natural resources and effective and proper use of these resources will help the country to become a developed state with strong economic prospects. To this end, comprehensive economic reforms are going on headed by President Heydar Aliyev and we are confident that all tasks in this respect will be successfully accomplished.

A Glimpse at U.S. Exports and Imports in 2000
Derek Nowek and Kelly Raftery
BISNIS, U.S. Department of Commerce

Azerbaijan was the second largest market for U.S. exports in the NIS, following Russia in the year 2000. While the purchase of two large aircraft certainly made a large difference in the figures, there were also a variety of other exports that impacted on Azerbaijan's trade with the U.S.

The most significant increase in U.S. exports to the Caucasus region (and a year-end record) was in trade with Azerbaijan, valued at $210 million. Commercial aircraft and parts led U.S. exports to Azerbaijan last year, jumping to $135.4 million and accounting for 64 percent of total sales. Two Boeing B757-200 aircraft acquired by Azerbaijan Airlines (AZAL) spurred the growth. The U.S. Export-Import Bank, in its first-ever transaction in Azerbaijan, provided the bulk of the financing for this transaction. The aircraft are equipped with Rolls Royce engines financed by the UK's Export Credit Guarantee Department, which made for a groundbreaking cooperative scheme in the way this transaction was realized.

Shipments of oil and gas machinery and parts, mostly bound for Azerbaijani oilfields, more than tripled last year to $35.3 million. The purchase of such machinery reflects the inflow of oil-related earnings and the country's ability to capitalize on rising world oil prices. U.S. merchandise deliveries of tobacco products were also significant at $15.6 million.

World Trade Atlas
United States – Total Exports – F.A.S. to Azerbaijan
January – December


Millions of U.S. Dollars (Revised)
% Share
% Change
HS Description
1998
1999
2000
1998
1999
2000
00/99
Azerbaijan 123 55 210 0.02 0.01 0.03 282.36
AIRCRAFT,SPACECRAFT 0.045 0.003 135.413 0.04 0.01 64.61 ###.##
MACHINERY 26.231 13.239 35.313 21.32 24.15 16.85 166.74
TOBACCO 66.453 15.155 14.896 54.00 27.65 7.11 -1.71
SPECIAL OTHER 7.160 9.314 11.569 5.82 16.99 5.52 24.20
ELECTRICAL MACHINERY 4.868 3.168 3.034 3.96 5.78 1.45 -4.24
OPTIC,NT 8544;MED INSTR 1.780 0.758 2.498 1.45 1.38 1.19 229.68
FATS AND OILS 1.294 0.845 1.041 1.05 1.54 0.50 23.21
STONE,PLASTR,CEMENT,ETC 0.00 0.510 0.883 0.00 0.93 0.42 73.17
MEAT 5.862 2.004 0.663 4.76 3.66 0.32 -66.90
IRON/STEEL PRODUCTS 0.487 0.578 0.658 0.40 1.05 0.31 13.96
MILLING;MALT;STARCH 0.585 3.733 0.609 0.48 6.81 0.29 -83.68
TOOL,CUTLRY, OF BASE MTL 2.955 0.310 0.402 2.40 0.57 0.19 29.74
ART AND ANTIQUES 0.00 0.009 0.350 0.00 0.02 0.17 ###.##
EXPLOSIVES 0.021 0.123 0.302 0.02 0.22 0.14 145.36
FOOD WASTE; ANIMAL FEED 0.013 0.00 0.256 0.01 0.00 0.12 ###.##
KNIT APPAREL 0.008 0.011 0.237 0.01 0.02 0.11 ###.##
VEGETABLES 0.431 0.523 0.230 0.35 0.95 0.11 -56.08
VEHICLES, NOT RAILWAY 0.755 0.263 0.185 0.61 0.48 0.09 -29.62
CEREALS 0.687 2.796 0.162 0.56 5.10 0.08 -94.20
FURNITURE AND BEDDING 0.392 0.135 0.139 0.32 0.25 0.07 3.07
INORG CHEM;RARE ERTH MT 0.00 0.003 0.122 0.00 0.01 0.06 ###.##
MINERAL FUEL, OIL ETC 0.00 0.00 0.115 0.00 0.00 0.06 ###.##
RUBBER 0.003 0.013 0.111 0.00 0.02 0.05 785.79
PERFUMERY,COSMETIC,ETC 0.00 0.043 0.076 0.00 0.08 0.04 78.40
PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS 0.003 0.257 0.050 0.00 0.47 0.02 -80.63
TEXTILE FLOOR COVERINGS 0.008 0.012 0.040 0.01 0.02 0.02 226.86
PLASTIC 0.111 0.583 0.039 0.09 1.06 0.02 -93.23
BOOK+NEWSPAPR;MANUSCRPT 1.700 0.088 0.031 1.38 0.16 0.01 -64.63
ORGANIC CHEMICALS 0.316 0.004 0.031 0.26 0.01 0.01 659.90
SPCL WOVEN FABRIC, ETC 0.010 0.00 0.029 0.01 0.00 0.01 ###.##
ALUMINUM 0.090 0.003 0.023 0.07 0.01 0.01 644.68
BEVERAGES 0.078 0.00 0.017 0.06 0.00 0.01 ###.##
MISC ART OF BASE METAL 0.240 0.040 0.016 0.19 0.07 0.01 -58.45
TOYS AND SPORTS EQUIPMT 0.049 0.00 0.010 0.04 0.00 0.00 ###.##
RAILWAY;TRF SIGN EQ 0.007 0.00 0.009 0.01 0.00 0.00 ###.##
TANNING,DYE,PAINT,PUTTY 0.00 0.00 0.008 0.00 0.00 0.00 ###.##
FOOTWEAR 0.003 0.162 0.007 0.00 0.29 0.00 -95.81
SILK;SILK YARN,FABRIC 0.00 0.00 0.006 0.00 0.00 0.00 ###.##
MISC. CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 0.00 0.00 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 ###.##
SOAP,WAX,ET;DENTAL PREP 0.006 0.00 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 ###.##
PHOTOGRAPHIC/CINEMATOGR 0.006 0.00 0.004 0.01 0.00 0.00 ###.##
GLASS AND GLASSWARE 0.00 0.00 0.003 0.00 0.00 0.00 ###.##
HEADGEAR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CERAMIC PRODUCTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
IRON AND STEEL 0.047 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
COPPER+ARTICLES THEREOF 0.003 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MANMADE STAPLE FIBERS 0.024 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
WADDING,FELT,TWINE,ROPE 0.026 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
IMPREGNATD TEXT FABRICS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
WOVEN APPAREL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MISC TEXTILE ARTICLES 0.031 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00
LEAD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER BASE METALS, ETC. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SHIPS AND BOATS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACT 0.007 0.012 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 -100.00
ALBUMINS;MOD STRCH;GLUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LEATHR ART;SADDLRY;BAGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FURSKIN+ARTIFICIAL FUR 0.015 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
WOOD 0.010 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
PAPER,PAPERBOARD 0.034 0.007 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.00 100.00
COTTON+YARN,FABRIC 0.003 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MANMADE FILAMENT,FABRIC 0.00 0.011 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 -100.00
PRESERVED FOOD 0.021 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 -100.00
MISCELLANEOUS FOOD 0.00 0.047 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00
LIVE TREES AND PLANTS 0.027 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
MISC GRAIN,SEED,FRUIT 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PREPARED MEAT,FISH,ETC 0.092 0.056 0.00 0.07 0.10 0.00 -100.00
BAKING RELATED 0.045 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
Source of Data: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Census

World Trade Atlas
United States – Total Exports – F.A.S. by Country
January – December

Millions of U.S. Dollars (Revised)
% Share
% Change
Rank Country 1998 1999 2000 1998 1999 2000 00/99
--World-- 682,138 695,797 781,918 100.00 100.00 100.00 12.38
1. -NIS- 4,593 3,064 3,118 0.67 0.44 0.40 1.75
2.Russia 3,553 2,060 2,092 0.52 0.30 0.27 1.58
3.Azerbaijan 123 55 210 0.02 0.01 0.03 282.36
4.Ukraine 368 205 191 0.05 0.03 0.02 -6.68
5.Uzbekistan 147 339 158 0.02 0.05 0.02 -53.47
6.Kazakhstan 103 180 124 0.02 0.03 0.02 -30.83
7.Georgia 137 84 110 0.02 0.01 0.01 31.10
8.Turkmenistan 28 18 84 0.00 0.00 0.01 357.79
9.Armenia 51 51 56 0.01 0.01 0.01 8.66
10.Belarus 30 26 31 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.47
11. Moldova 21 11 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 158.45
12.Kyrgyzstan 21 23 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27
13.Tajikistan 12 14 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 -12.76
Source of Data: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Census

World Trade Atlas
United States – General Imports – Customs Value from Azerbaijan
January – December

Millions of US Dollars (Revised)
% Share
%Change
0HS Description 1998 1999 2000 1998 1999 2000 00/99
Azerbaijan 5 26 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 -20.29
ART AND ANTIQUES 1.998 3.568 6.969 40.37 13.59 33.30 95.33
MINERAL FUEL, OIL ETC 0.00 17.927 4.288 0.00 68.27 20.49 -76.08
WOVEN APPAREL 0.281 0.833 3.127 5.67 3.17 14.94 275.54
MISC GRAIN,SEED,FRUIT 1.156 1.904 2.409 23.36 7.25 11.51 26.52
KNIT APPAREL 0.290 1.073 1.464 5.87 4.09 7.00 36.47
PREPARED MEAT,FISH,ETC 0.00 0.138 1.298 0.00 0.53 6.20 839.23
SPECIAL OTHER 0.970 0.104 0.490 19.60 0.39 2.34 373.66
FISH AND SEAFOOD 0.00 0.00 0.361 0.00 0.00 1.72 ###.##
EDIBLE FRUIT AND NUTS 0.076 0.203 0.138 1.54 0.77 0.66 -31.78
TEXTILE FLOOR COVERINGS 0.025 0.053 0.114 0.50 0.20 0.54 114.29
O SPECL IMPR PROVISIONS 0.021 0.153 0.106 0.42 0.58 0.51 -30.52
PRESERVED FOOD 0.00 0.044 0.072 0.00 0.17 0.34 62.54
RUBBER 0.00 0.047 0.016 0.00 0.18 0.08 -66.23
BEVERAGES 0.00 0.00 0.016 0.00 0.00 0.08 ###.##
MACHINERY 0.00 0.010 0.015 0.00 0.04 0.07 51.80
ELECTRICAL MACHINERY 0.00 0.002 0.011 0.00 0.01 0.05 338.81
SUGARS 0.00 0.00 0.009 0.00 0.00 0.04 ###.##
COCOA 0.00 0.00 0.007 0.00 0.00 0.03 ###.##
SPICES,COFFEE AND TEA 0.00 0.00 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.02 ###.##
FOOTWEAR 0.013 0.00 0.004 0.26 0.00 0.02 ###.##
PAPER,PAPERBOARD 0.00 0.00 0.003 0.00 0.00 0.02 ###.##
MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.003 0.00 0.00 0.02 ###.##
HEADGEAR 0.00 0.00 0.003 0.00 0.00 0.01 ###.##
PLASTIC 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.00 ###.##
HIDES AND SKINS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FURSKIN+ARTIFICIAL FUR 0.016 0.042 0.00 0.33 0.16 0.00 -100.00
WOOD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SALT;SULFUR;EARTH,STONE 0.00 0.082 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 -100.00
ORES,SLAG,ASH 0.013 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 -100.00
TANNING,DYE,PAINT,PUTTY 0.020 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00
VEGETABLES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MISCELLANEOUS FOOD 0.00 0.031 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 -100.00
PRECIOUS STONES,METALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ALUMINUM 0.00 0.004 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 -100.00
BOOK+NEWSPAPR;MANUSCRPT 0.061 0.003 0.00 1.23 0.01 0.00 -100.00
WADDING,FELT,TWINE,ROPE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FURNITURE AND BEDDING 0.00 0.024 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 -100.00
TOYS AND SPORTS EQUIPMT 0.022 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00
MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Source of Data: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Census

World Trade Atlas
United States General Imports – Customs Value by Country
January – December

Millions of U.S. Dollars (Revised)
% Share
% Change
Rank Country 1998 1999 2000 1998 1999 2000 00/99
--World-- 911,896 1024,618 1218,022 100.00 100.00 100.00 18.88
1. -NIS- 6,768 6,977 9,325 0.74 0.68 0.77 33.66
2.Russia 5,747 5,921 7,659 0.63 0.58 0.63 29.35
3.Ukraine 531 529 872 0.06 0.05 0.07 64.91
4.Kazakhstan 169 229 429 0.02 0.02 0.04 87.25
5. Moldova 109 87 105 0.01 0.01 0.01 20.93
6.Belarus 105 94 104 0.01 0.01 0.01 11.10
7.Uzbekistan 34 26 41 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.94
8.Georgia 14 18 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.68
9.Turkmenistan 3 9 28 0.00 0.00 0.00 228.99
10.Armenia 17 15 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.43
11.Azerbaijan 5 26 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 -20.29
12.Tajikistan 33 23 9 0.00 0.00 0.00 -60.51
13.Kyrgyzstan 0 1 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 274.83
Source of Data: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Census